rneovim.git/test/functional/lua/buffer_updates_spec.lua, branch usermarks Neovim fork with Rahm's personal hacks. docs: fix typos (#20394) 2022-09-30T07:53:52+00:00 dundargoc 33953936+dundargoc@users.noreply.github.com 2022-09-30T07:53:52+00:00 df646572c53f55268a5dbb61628d7c3b302d5663 Co-authored-by: Raphael <glephunter@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: smjonas <jonas.strittmatter@gmx.de> Co-authored-by: zeertzjq <zeertzjq@outlook.com> 
Co-authored-by: Raphael <glephunter@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: smjonas <jonas.strittmatter@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: zeertzjq <zeertzjq@outlook.com>
 fix!: make :undo! notify buffer update callbacks (#20344) 2022-09-25T23:15:07+00:00 zeertzjq zeertzjq@outlook.com 2022-09-25T23:15:07+00:00 ac66f5af06ac1f306b0ddb366ba81093508546c4 When :undo! was introduced to Nvim the implementation of 'inccommand' preview callback hasn't been fully decided yet, so not notifying buffer update callbacks made sense for 'inccommand' preview callback in case it needs to undo the changes itself. Now it turns out that the undo-and-forget is done automatically for 'inccommand', so it doesn't make sense for :undo! to avoid notifying buffer update callbacks anymore. 
When :undo! was introduced to Nvim the implementation of 'inccommand'
preview callback hasn't been fully decided yet, so not notifying buffer
update callbacks made sense for 'inccommand' preview callback in case it
needs to undo the changes itself.
Now it turns out that the undo-and-forget is done automatically for
'inccommand', so it doesn't make sense for :undo! to avoid notifying
buffer update callbacks anymore.
 Merge pull request #18931 from zeertzjq/regexp-num-escaped 2022-06-12T23:18:38+00:00 zeertzjq zeertzjq@outlook.com 2022-06-12T23:18:38+00:00 c665773897ca31c6e1270c2d52939e33df35106b fix(substitute): subtract number of backslashes later 
fix(substitute): subtract number of backslashes later
 fix(buffer): disable buffer-updates before removing from window #18933 2022-06-12T22:02:00+00:00 zeertzjq zeertzjq@outlook.com 2022-06-12T22:02:00+00:00 429c40cce3fce3b5391afef8208d65a80a316018 There can be other places that access window buffer info (e.g. `tabpagebuflist()`), so checking `w_closing` in `win_findbuf()` doesn't solve the crash in all cases, and may also cause Nvim's behavior to diverge from Vim. Fix #14998 
There can be other places that access window buffer info (e.g.
`tabpagebuflist()`), so checking `w_closing` in `win_findbuf()` doesn't
solve the crash in all cases, and may also cause Nvim's behavior to
diverge from Vim.

Fix #14998
 fix(substitute): subtract number of backslashes later 2022-06-12T12:42:30+00:00 zeertzjq zeertzjq@outlook.com 2022-06-11T23:48:28+00:00 41bb81a2dfe3c173a5d8f9d7c200475028221cf3 






fix(extmarks): splice extmarks on accepting spell
2022-04-02T16:35:33+00:00

Tony Chen
tchen1998@gmail.com

2022-04-02T16:35:33+00:00

ea71c26ec922a80cf2f05d5bc553dc70f0e130f0












fix(buffer_updates): handle :sort of already sorted buffer
2021-10-08T14:15:35+00:00

Björn Linse
bjorn.linse@gmail.com

2021-10-08T14:13:53+00:00

ef687d3218adcb55698a03c3b21b625195e0ba98












fix(buffer_updates): cleanup test behavior
2021-10-07T18:22:10+00:00

Björn Linse
bjorn.linse@gmail.com

2021-10-07T17:06:09+00:00

54b2c6800e9809b749381890da0f98f63f5fe53b












fix(buffer_updates): make `lockmarks` not affect extmarks and buffer updates. fixes #12861
2021-10-07T18:21:23+00:00

Anton Adamansky
adamansky@gmail.com

2021-07-05T16:30:07+00:00

7d171b1c48377aa5724d3bed0f497bf729b39b1c

Now mark_adjust() will trigger appropriate buf_updates_send_splice() called by extmark_adjust()





Now mark_adjust() will trigger appropriate buf_updates_send_splice() called by extmark_adjust()







fix(buffer_updates): handle :delete of the very last line in buffer
2021-10-07T17:35:49+00:00

Björn Linse
bjorn.linse@gmail.com

2021-10-07T17:35:49+00:00

8335e26b2d0226f5b50fb4a9c4e6d37919aeb212