Bumps [actions/github-script](https://github.com/actions/github-script) from 6 to 7.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/github-script/releases)
- [Commits](https://github.com/actions/github-script/compare/v6...v7)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: actions/github-script
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

Bumps [actions/checkout](https://github.com/actions/checkout) from 3 to 4.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/checkout/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/actions/checkout/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v3...v4)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: actions/checkout
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>

Team reviewers is a nice feature that comes with a severe drawback: it
makes testing the workflows incredibly difficult as they won't work
without a similar token by the tester.

Using team reviewers when possible reduces the churn on the git history
as we'll be able to add or remove reviewers without needing to change
the workflow files.

This requires using Github fine-grained personal access tokens with Pull
Requests set to "Read and write" and Members to "Read-only".