diff options
author | zeertzjq <zeertzjq@outlook.com> | 2023-11-17 07:14:07 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | zeertzjq <zeertzjq@outlook.com> | 2023-11-17 07:16:04 +0800 |
commit | 809b05bf276892101895a713e1b8d1c209e5dfb7 (patch) | |
tree | 1bed22e6ccd92f27409b2472a10855c51851ba89 /runtime/lua/vim/snippet.lua | |
parent | 016c6fae2740781a4c62f382673de1f86732533a (diff) | |
download | rneovim-809b05bf276892101895a713e1b8d1c209e5dfb7.tar.gz rneovim-809b05bf276892101895a713e1b8d1c209e5dfb7.tar.bz2 rneovim-809b05bf276892101895a713e1b8d1c209e5dfb7.zip |
vim-patch:9.0.2110: [security]: overflow in ex address parsing
Problem: [security]: overflow in ex address parsing
Solution: Verify that lnum is positive, before substracting from
LONG_MAX
[security]: overflow in ex address parsing
When parsing relative ex addresses one may unintentionally cause an
overflow (because LONG_MAX - lnum will overflow for negative addresses).
So verify that lnum is actually positive before doing the overflow
check.
https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/060623e4a3bc72b011e7cd92bedb3bfb64e06200
Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'runtime/lua/vim/snippet.lua')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions