| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The benefit of this is that users only pay for what they use. If e.g.
only `vim.lsp.buf_get_clients()` is called then they don't need to load
all modules under `vim.lsp` which could lead to significant startuptime
saving.
Also `vim.lsp.module` is a bit nicer to user compared to
`require("vim.lsp.module")`.
This isn't used for some nested modules such as `filetype` as it breaks
tests with error messages such as "attempt to index field 'detect'".
It's not entirely certain the reason for this, but it is likely it is
due to filetype being precompiled which would imply deferred loading
isn't needed for performance reasons.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem:
If `neovim` module is not installed, python and ruby healthchecks fail:
- ERROR Failed to run healthcheck for "provider.python" plugin. Exception:
.../runtime/lua/provider/python/health.lua:348: attempt to concatenate local 'pyname' (a nil value)
- ERROR Failed to run healthcheck for "provider.ruby" plugin. Exception:
.../runtime/lua/provider/ruby/health.lua:25: attempt to index local 'host' (a nil value)
Solution:
Check for non-nil.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
Credit to @wookayin for the fix.
|
| | |
|
|
|
* Prefer pure Lua functions over vim.fn
* Split up provider healthchecks into separate modules to help manage
complexity
|
