| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
https://github.com/mpeterv/luacheck/pull/81#issuecomment-261099606
> If you really want to use bleeding-edge version you should get the
> rockspec from master branch, not a fixed commit ...
> The correct way to install from a specific commit is cloning that
> commit and running "luarocks make" from project directory. The reason
> is that running "install" or "build" on an scm rockspec fetches
> sources from master but uses build description from the rockspec
> itself, which may be outdated.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In 3b12bb225adda2aac40a55f7009cae05311b2a43, ":oldfiles" was taught to
behave like Vim's ":browse oldfiles" if ":oldfiles!" was used. However,
this conflates the use of ! for abandoning a modified buffer with
choosing one file out of a list of oldfiles.
Now that ":browse" is supported again, ":browse oldfiles" will allow the
user to select an old file, while still complaining if that would cause
a modified buffer to be abandoned. ":browse oldfiles!" will just
abandon the buffer, as expected.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
It is otherwise impossible to determine which test failed sanitizer/valgrind
check. test/functional/helpers.lua module return was changed so that tests which
do not provide after_each function to get new check will automatically fail.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
If Nvim is in a "Press ENTER..." screen before the `get_vvar()` call, the test
will hang.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #3676.
Reviewed-by: Marco Hinz <mh.codebro@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- change approach for test 1: screen:expect() instead of assert()
- use execute() instead of command()
- 2 new tests that check none and wrong input for :oldfiles!
Helped-by: @fwalch
Helped-by: @tarruda
Helper-by: @justinmk
|
| |
|
