| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem:
vim.iter has both `rfind()` and various `*back()` methods, which work
in "reverse" or "backwards" order. It's inconsistent to have both kinds
of names, and "back" is fairly uncommon (rust) compared to python
(rfind, rstrip, rsplit, …).
Solution:
- Remove `nthback()` and let `nth()` take a negative index.
- Because `rnth()` looks pretty obscure, and because it's intuitive
for a function named `nth()` to take negative indexes.
- Rename `xxback()` methods to `rxx()`.
- This informally groups the "list-iterator" functions under a common
`r` prefix, which helps discoverability.
- Rename `peekback()` to `pop()`, in duality with the existing `peek`.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Specifically, functions that are run in the context of the test runner
are put in module `test/testutil.lua` while the functions that are run
in the context of the test session are put in
`test/functional/testnvim.lua`.
Closes https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/27004.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Work on https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/27004.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Co-authored-by: Gregory Anders <greg@gpanders.com>
Co-authored-by: Jongwook Choi <wookayin@gmail.com>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If an iterator pipeline stage returns nil as its first return value, the
other return values are ignored and it is treated as if that stage
returned only nil (the semantics of returning nil are different between
different stages). This is consistent with how for loops work in Lua
more generally, where the for loop breaks when the first return value
from the function iterator is nil (see :h for-in for details).
|
| |
|
|
| |
A table passed to `vim.iter` can be a class instance with a `__call`
implementation for the iterator protocol.
|
| |
|
