From 6267996f13c5fd2ae8023b85c48e0e207e278cd9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zeertzjq Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 15:42:36 +0800 Subject: vim-patch:8.2.4455: accepting one and zero for second sort() argument is strange Problem: Accepting one and zero for the second sort() argument is strange. Solution: Disallow using one and zero in Vim9 script. https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/2007dd49f5cb36f944cab1cfbceb0f864e625f74 Co-authored-by: Bram Moolenaar --- runtime/lua/vim/_meta/vimfn.lua | 21 +++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) (limited to 'runtime/lua/vim') diff --git a/runtime/lua/vim/_meta/vimfn.lua b/runtime/lua/vim/_meta/vimfn.lua index 17eda634e0..d1c90249ed 100644 --- a/runtime/lua/vim/_meta/vimfn.lua +++ b/runtime/lua/vim/_meta/vimfn.lua @@ -8531,15 +8531,16 @@ function vim.fn.sockconnect(mode, address, opts) end --- If you want a list to remain unmodified make a copy first: >vim --- let sortedlist = sort(copy(mylist)) --- ----