From dc7ccd6bca81dfa6ade6462a6e30770c63d48266 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gregory Anders <8965202+gpanders@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:13:40 -0500
Subject: fix(treesitter): use 0 as initial value for computing maximum
 (#27837)

Using -1 as the initial value can cause the pattern offset to become
negative, which in turn results in a negative subpriority, which fails
validation in nvim_buf_set_extmark.
---
 runtime/lua/vim/treesitter/highlighter.lua | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'runtime/lua/vim')

diff --git a/runtime/lua/vim/treesitter/highlighter.lua b/runtime/lua/vim/treesitter/highlighter.lua
index cc5e11d632..cbab5e990e 100644
--- a/runtime/lua/vim/treesitter/highlighter.lua
+++ b/runtime/lua/vim/treesitter/highlighter.lua
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ local function on_line_impl(self, buf, line, is_spell_nav)
         :iter_matches(root_node, self.bufnr, line, root_end_row + 1, { all = true })
     end
 
-    local max_pattern_index = -1
+    local max_pattern_index = 0
     while line >= state.next_row do
       local pattern, match, metadata = state.iter()
 
-- 
cgit