From 34cb0879551b8217db820f684d913a393f4f38cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sean Dewar Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 22:50:09 +0100 Subject: vim-patch:8.1.1355: obvious mistakes are accepted as valid expressions Problem: Obvious mistakes are accepted as valid expressions. Solution: Be more strict about parsing numbers. (Yasuhiro Matsumoto, closes vim/vim#3981) https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/16e9b85113e0b354ece1cb4f5fcc7866850f3685 Update vim_str2nr_spec.lua to add more tests that use strict = true. --- src/nvim/viml/parser/expressions.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/nvim/viml/parser/expressions.c') diff --git a/src/nvim/viml/parser/expressions.c b/src/nvim/viml/parser/expressions.c index e9d82ca87d..f5bd5479c4 100644 --- a/src/nvim/viml/parser/expressions.c +++ b/src/nvim/viml/parser/expressions.c @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ LexExprToken viml_pexpr_next_token(ParserState *const pstate, const int flags) } if (exp_start) { vim_str2nr(pline.data + exp_start, NULL, NULL, 0, NULL, &exp_part, - (int)(ret.len - exp_start)); + (int)(ret.len - exp_start), false); } if (exp_negative) { exp_part += frac_size; @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ LexExprToken viml_pexpr_next_token(ParserState *const pstate, const int flags) int len; int prep; vim_str2nr(pline.data, &prep, &len, STR2NR_ALL, NULL, - &ret.data.num.val.integer, (int)pline.size); + &ret.data.num.val.integer, (int)pline.size, false); ret.len = (size_t)len; const uint8_t bases[] = { [0] = 10, -- cgit