From 08991b078267e5de0a19a136d00d4f71ad651a32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: dundargoc <33953936+dundargoc@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 21:33:22 +0200 Subject: docs: small fixes Co-authored-by: Christian Clason Co-authored-by: Gregory Anders Co-authored-by: HiPhish Co-authored-by: Julio B Co-authored-by: T727 <74924917+T-727@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: camoz Co-authored-by: champignoom <66909116+champignoom@users.noreply.github.com> --- src/nvim/viml/parser/expressions.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/nvim/viml/parser') diff --git a/src/nvim/viml/parser/expressions.c b/src/nvim/viml/parser/expressions.c index d1c6426cba..830d8c5f34 100644 --- a/src/nvim/viml/parser/expressions.c +++ b/src/nvim/viml/parser/expressions.c @@ -2866,7 +2866,7 @@ viml_pexpr_parse_no_paren_closing_error: {} case kENodeOperator: if (prev_token.type == kExprLexSpacing) { // For some reason "function (args)" is a function call, but - // "(funcref) (args)" is not. AFAIR this somehow involves + // "(funcref) (args)" is not. As far as I remember this somehow involves // compatibility and Bram was commenting that this is // intentionally inconsistent and he is not very happy with the // situation himself. -- cgit