From e2fbbb292f4a213a531f2e3693ba44e11defe752 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ZyX Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:24:46 +0300 Subject: eval: Refactor item_lock If I am not mistaking, this commit should not change any functionality. --- test/functional/eval/changedtick_spec.lua | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'test/functional/eval') diff --git a/test/functional/eval/changedtick_spec.lua b/test/functional/eval/changedtick_spec.lua index f1ed95dd16..6c5c91667f 100644 --- a/test/functional/eval/changedtick_spec.lua +++ b/test/functional/eval/changedtick_spec.lua @@ -95,17 +95,19 @@ describe('b:changedtick', function() redir_exec(':let b:')) end) it('fails to unlock b:changedtick', function() + -- Note: + -- - unlocking VAR_FIXED variables is not an error. + -- - neither VAR_FIXED variables are reported as locked by islocked(). + -- So test mostly checks that b:changedtick status does not change. eq(0, exc_exec('let d = b:')) eq(1, funcs.islocked('b:changedtick')) - -- FIXME - -- eq(1, funcs.islocked('d.changedtick')) + eq(0, funcs.islocked('d.changedtick')) eq('\nE46: Cannot change read-only variable "b:changedtick"', redir_exec('unlockvar b:changedtick')) - -- FIXME - -- eq('\nE46: Cannot change read-only variable "b:changedtick"', - -- redir_exec('unlockvar d.changedtick')) + eq('', + redir_exec('unlockvar d.changedtick')) eq(1, funcs.islocked('b:changedtick')) - -- eq(1, funcs.islocked('d.changedtick')) + eq(0, funcs.islocked('d.changedtick')) end) it('is being completed', function() feed(':echo b:let cmdline=""') -- cgit