From db3c797c6b3ce9c4f0f50ae22acde0c1aac60725 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marco Hinz Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 00:52:12 +0100 Subject: provider: improve error message if provider is missing (#9487) Move `has_eval_provider()` check to `eval_call_provider()` to make sure that every code path calls it first. Previously we would, when pynvim was missing, get a nice error message for `:python3 1`, but not for `:py3file blah`. Fixes https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/9485 --- test/functional/provider/python_spec.lua | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'test/functional/provider/python_spec.lua') diff --git a/test/functional/provider/python_spec.lua b/test/functional/provider/python_spec.lua index 15df76d2f6..869cfd1721 100644 --- a/test/functional/provider/python_spec.lua +++ b/test/functional/provider/python_spec.lua @@ -19,8 +19,9 @@ do clear() if missing_provider('python') then it(':python reports E319 if provider is missing', function() - expect_err([[Vim%(python%):E319: No "python" provider found.*]], - command, 'python print("foo")') + local expected = [[Vim%(py.*%):E319: No "python" provider found.*]] + expect_err(expected, command, 'py print("foo")') + expect_err(expected, command, 'pyfile foo') end) pending('Python 2 (or the pynvim module) is broken/missing', function() end) return -- cgit