From db3aabcc34464940c286d7ce3abc8f3edc94b7bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: nicm Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 12:42:37 +0000 Subject: Add a NOBLOCK flag rather than adding amount to wait for when dealing with potentially-long sequences. GitHub issue 3001. --- tty.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tty.c') diff --git a/tty.c b/tty.c index a9678eaf..3aefe784 100644 --- a/tty.c +++ b/tty.c @@ -206,6 +206,11 @@ tty_block_maybe(struct tty *tty) size_t size = EVBUFFER_LENGTH(tty->out); struct timeval tv = { .tv_usec = TTY_BLOCK_INTERVAL }; + if (size == 0) + tty->flags &= ~TTY_NOBLOCK; + else if (tty->flags & TTY_NOBLOCK) + return (0); + if (size < TTY_BLOCK_START(tty)) return (0); @@ -2088,8 +2093,8 @@ tty_set_selection(struct tty *tty, const char *buf, size_t len) encoded = xmalloc(size); b64_ntop(buf, len, encoded, size); + tty->flags |= TTY_NOBLOCK; tty_putcode_ptr2(tty, TTYC_MS, "", encoded); - tty->client->redraw = EVBUFFER_LENGTH(tty->out); free(encoded); } @@ -2097,6 +2102,7 @@ tty_set_selection(struct tty *tty, const char *buf, size_t len) void tty_cmd_rawstring(struct tty *tty, const struct tty_ctx *ctx) { + tty->flags |= TTY_NOBLOCK; tty_add(tty, ctx->ptr, ctx->num); tty_invalidate(tty); } -- cgit