| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem: Expected text for interactive marks is in a separate json file
from the tutor file. When the tutor file is updated, line numbers
(potentially many) have to be updated in the json file. This is a
burden for maintenance and automatic testing.
Solution: Put the expected text inline in the tutor file, marked
with `[[]]`. Parse and remove the comments before opening the tutor
file so extmarks can be applied.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Close #36806
Close #36812
Close #37003
Close #37016
Close #37038
Close #37039
Close #37157
Close #37185
Close #37213
Co-authored-by: saroj_r <sarojregmi.official@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Olivia Kinnear <git@superatomic.dev>
Co-authored-by: Igor <igorlfs@ufmg.br>
Co-authored-by: Justin Roberts <JustinEdwardLeo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: "Mike J. McGuirk" <mike.j.mcguirk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aymen Hafeez <49293546+aymenhafeez@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Peter Cardenas <16930781+PeterCardenas@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: DrNayak2306 <dhruvgnk.work@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
#36622
This reverts commit 5e039c8e9775651bc24cf8a669d33217b24bd59e.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
1. Every hyperlink-like element was replaced by `"$1"` (where $1 is the original string showed in the hyperlink);
2. Arrows `--->` were used in lines containing practice examples when no editing text is involved;
3. Context on interactivity was minimally adapted when strictly needed, not to disrupt the original tutor's intent;
4. Tests regarding the tutor file refactored to ensure the new syntax is not flagged as an error.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem:
- Extmark breaks lesson 3.1 of vim-01-beginner.tutor because when users
delete the line and put it elsewhere, the extmark doesn't move to the
put location.
- This doesn't mean the extmark implementation is bad though (note that
thanks to extmark, for the first time, we can make lesson 2.6 really
interactive), it's just that the tutor format has never been made for
kinds of lessons like lesson 3.1, which is why all "expected" in that
lesson are -1, which also means that lesson is not interactive in the
first place. Also see lesson 2.1.3 in vim-02-beginner, where the mark
is just used to mark the first line of the exercise, which also prove
my point.
Solution:
- For a not-really-interactive lesson like lesson 3.1, just use legacy
syntax. I borrow the old vimtutor's `--->` to mark the exercises of
the lesson.
- Less redundant interactive marks also make the json files smaller and
more maintainable.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem:
From https://matrix.to/#/!cylwlNXSwagQmZSkzs:matrix.org/$Ofj-TFIsEMbp0O9OhE8xuZSNi-nhRLtZTOgs6JRLNrs?via=matrix.org&via=gitter.im&via=mozilla.org
In lesson 2.6, users are asked to remove the second, forth and fifth
lines with `dd` command, then they are asked to undo twice to make the
text go back to original state. But after that, the mark ✗ appears
again, which confuses the user because they think they do something
wrong. This is a limitation with the current implementation, which is
based on line number only.
Solution:
Reimplement interactive marks as extmarks in Lua. This also make the
feature less fragile, as users can remove, add some arbitrary lines
without breaking the interactive marks.
Co-authored-by: Justin M. Keyes <justinkz@gmail.com>
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: glepnir <glephunter@gmail.com>
|
