aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/nvim
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
...
| * | | | | | vim-patch:9.0.1969: [security] buffer-overflow in trunc_string()zeertzjq2023-11-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Problem: buffer-overflow in trunc_string() Solution: Add NULL at end of buffer Currently trunc_string() assumes that when the string is too long, buf[e-1] will always be writeable. But that assumption may not always be true. The condition currently looks like this else if (e + 3 < buflen) [...] else { // can't fit in the "...", just truncate it buf[e - 1] = NUL; } but this means, we may run into the last else clause with e still being larger than buflen. So a buffer overflow occurs. So instead of using `buf[e - 1]`, let's just always truncate at `buf[buflen - 1]` which should always be writable. https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/3bd7fa12e146c6051490d048a4acbfba974eeb04 vim-patch:9.0.2004: Missing test file Problem: Missing test file Solution: git-add the file to the repo closes: vim/vim#13305 https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/d4afbdd0715c722cfc73d3a8ab9e578667615faa Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
| * | | | | | vim-patch:9.0.1864: still crash with bt_quickfix1_poczeertzjq2023-11-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Problem: crash with bt_quickfix1_poc when cleaning up and EXITFREE is defined Solution: Test if buffer is valid in a window, else close window directly, don't try to access buffer properties While at it, increase the crash timeout slightly, so that CI has a chance to finish processing the test_crash() test. https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/623ba31821a41acee7e948794e84867680b97885 Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
| * | | | | | vim-patch:9.0.1858: [security] heap use after free in ins_compl_get_exp()zeertzjq2023-11-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Problem: heap use after free in ins_compl_get_exp() Solution: validate buffer before accessing it https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/ee9166eb3b41846661a39b662dc7ebe8b5e15139 Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
| * | | | | | vim-patch:9.0.1857: [security] heap-use-after-free in is_qf_win()zeertzjq2023-11-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Problem: heap-use-after-free in is_qf_win() Solution: Check buffer is valid before accessing it https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/fc68299d436cf87453e432daa77b6d545df4d7ed Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
| * | | | | | vim-patch:9.0.2107: [security]: FPE in adjust_plines_for_skipcol (#26082)zeertzjq2023-11-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Problem: [security]: FPE in adjust_plines_for_skipcol Solution: don't divide by zero, return zero Prevent a floating point exception when calculating w_skipcol (which can happen with a small window when the number option is set and cpo+=n). Add a test to verify https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/cb0b99f0672d8446585d26e998343dceca17d1ce Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
| * | | | | | vim-patch:9.0.2111: [security]: overflow in get_numberzeertzjq2023-11-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Problem: [security]: overflow in get_number Solution: Return 0 when the count gets too large [security]: overflow in get_number When using the z= command, we may overflow the count with values larger than MAX_INT. So verify that we do not overflow and in case when an overflow is detected, simply return 0 https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/73b2d3790cad5694fc0ed0db2926e4220c48d968 Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
| * | | | | | vim-patch:9.0.2110: [security]: overflow in ex address parsingzeertzjq2023-11-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Problem: [security]: overflow in ex address parsing Solution: Verify that lnum is positive, before substracting from LONG_MAX [security]: overflow in ex address parsing When parsing relative ex addresses one may unintentionally cause an overflow (because LONG_MAX - lnum will overflow for negative addresses). So verify that lnum is actually positive before doing the overflow check. https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/060623e4a3bc72b011e7cd92bedb3bfb64e06200 Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
| * | | | | | vim-patch:9.0.2109: [security]: overflow in nv_z_get_countzeertzjq2023-11-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Problem: [security]: overflow in nv_z_get_count Solution: break out, if count is too large When getting the count for a normal z command, it may overflow for large counts given. So verify, that we can safely store the result in a long. https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/58f9befca1fa172068effad7f2ea5a9d6a7b0cca Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
| * | | | | | vim-patch:9.0.2108: [security]: overflow with count for :s commandzeertzjq2023-11-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Problem: [security]: overflow with count for :s command Solution: Abort the :s command if the count is too large If the count after the :s command is larger than what fits into a (signed) long variable, abort with e_value_too_large. Adds a test with INT_MAX as count and verify it correctly fails. It seems the return value on Windows using mingw compiler wraps around, so the initial test using :s/./b/9999999999999999999999999990 doesn't fail there, since the count is wrapping around several times and finally is no longer larger than 2147483647. So let's just use 2147483647 in the test, which hopefully will always cause a failure https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/ac63787734fda2e294e477af52b3bd601517fa78 Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
| * | | | | | vim-patch:9.0.1532: crash when expanding "~" in substitute causes very long textzeertzjq2023-11-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Problem: Crash when expanding "~" in substitute causes very long text. Solution: Limit the text length to MAXCOL. https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/ab9a2d884b3a4abe319606ea95a5a6d6b01cd73a Co-authored-by: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
| * | | | | | feat(tui): support DCS responses in TermResponse event (#26061)Gregory Anders2023-11-16
| | | | | | |
| * | | | | | refactor: remove B_SPELL macro (#26063)zeertzjq2023-11-16
| | | | | | |
| * | | | | | refactor: iwyu (#26062)zeertzjq2023-11-16
| | | | | | |
| * | | | | | refactor: move some functions to winfloat.c (#26020)Raphael2023-11-16
| | | | | | |
| * | | | | | fix(tui): do not toggle cursor visibility when flushing the buffer (#26055)Gregory Anders2023-11-15
| |/ / / / / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When writing large amounts of data to the tty it is common to first hide the cursor to avoid a flickering effect. This has been done in Nvim for a long time and was implemented in the function that actually flushed the TUI buffer out to the TTY. However, when using synchronized updates with the 'termsync' option this is no longer necessary, as the terminal emulator will buffer all of the updates and display them atomically. Thus there is no need to toggle the cursor visibility when flushing the buffer when synchronized updates are used. In fact, doing so can actually reintroduce cursor flickering in certain scenarios because the visibility state is itself being synchronized by the terminal. In addition, the management of the cursor visibility should not happen when the TUI _buffer_ is flushed, but rather when the TUI itself is flushed. This is a subtle but meaningful distinction: the former literally writes bytes to the TTY while the latter flushes the TUI's grid into its buffer. There is no need to hide the cursor every time we write bytes to the TTY, only at the beginning of a full TUI "flush" event.
| * | | | | vim-patch:9.0.2105: skipcol not reset when topline changed (#26042)luukvbaal2023-11-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Problem: Skipcol is not reset when topline changed scrolling cursor to top Solution: reset skipcol closes: vim/vim#13528 https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/bb800a7907209f7d349f87b76b3b9ca30b416298
| * | | | | feat(tui): add 'termsync' option (#25871)Gregory Anders2023-11-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The 'termsync' option enables a mode (provided the underlying terminal supports it) where all screen updates during a redraw cycle are buffered and drawn together when the redraw is complete. This eliminates tearing or flickering in cases where Nvim redraws slower than the terminal redraws the screen.
| * | | | | refactor: vim.ui.clipboard #26040Justin M. Keyes2023-11-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Problem: Platform-specific UI providers should live in `vim.ui.*`. #24164 Solution: - Move `vim.clipboard.osc52` module to `vim.ui.clipboard.osc52`. - TODO: move all of `clipboard.vim` to `vim.ui.clipboard`. ref #25872
| * | | | | fix(defaults): set 'fsync' #26034Ploum2023-11-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |