| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem:
Tree-sitter uses UINT32_MAX for full-document ranges, which becomes -1 on 32-bit platforms and reaches _foldupdate as an invalid end row.
Solution:
Treat negative changed-range end rows as unbounded and clamp them to the buffer line count. Add a regression test that simulates the 32-bit sentinel.
AI-assisted: Codex
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem:
The magic globals `it`, `describe`, etc., are more trouble than they are
worth.
- Hooking into `after_each` requires `getfenv()` hacks.
- They confuse luals/emmylua, because the top-level `.luarc.json` isn't
merged with `test/.luarc.json` (apparently a luals limitation?)
- They totally defeat discoverability because the user just has to
"know" about the various magic symbols.
So they harm DX, which means they serve no purpose at all.
Solution:
- Expose the test API from `testutil`, so tests can call `t.it()`,
`t.describe()`, etc., in the conventional way.
- Drop `getfenv()` hacks.
- Drop the `setfenv()` injection in `load_chunk`.
- Drop `test/_meta.lua`.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem:
with `foldmethod=expr foldexpr=v:lua.vim.treesitter.foldexpr()
foldminlines=0`, deleting lines at the end of the buffer always
reports an invalid top error, because the top value (i.e. the
start line number of the deletion) is always 1 greater than
the total line number of the modified buffer.
Solution:
remove the ml_line_count validation
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
FAILED
test/functional/treesitter/fold_spec.lua
@
720
:
treesitter foldexpr doesn't open folds that are not touched
test/functional/treesitter/fold_spec.lua:767: Row 1 did not match.
Expected:
|*{1:-}^t1 |
|*{1:-}# h2 |
|*{1:│}t2 |
|{3:~ }|
|{3:~ }|
|{3:~ }|
|{3:~ }|
|1 line less; before #2 {MATCH:.*}|
Actual:
|*{1: }^t1 |
|*{1:+}{2:+-- 2 lines: # h2·····················}|
|*{3:~ }|
|{3:~ }|
|{3:~ }|
|{3:~ }|
|{3:~ }|
|1 line less; before #2 0 seconds ago |
To print the expect() call that would assert the current screen state, use
screen:snapshot_util(). In case of non-deterministic failures, use
screen:redraw_debug() to show all intermediate screen states.
Snapshot:
screen:expect([[
{1: }^t1 |
{1:+}{2:+-- 2 lines: # h2·····················}|
{3:~ }|*5
1 line less; before #2 0 seconds ago |
]])
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem: Last diff folds not merged (after v8.1.1922)
Solution: loop over all windows in the current tabpage and update all
folds (Gary Johnson)
This commit fixes a bug where the last two folds of a diff are not
merged when the last difference between the two diff'd buffers is
resolved.
Normally, when two buffers are diff'd, folding is used to show only the
text that differs and to hide the text that is the same between the two
buffers. When a difference is resolved by making a block of text the
same in both buffers, the folds are updated to merge that block with the
folds above and below it into one closed fold.
That updating of the folds did not occur when the block of text was the
last diff block in the buffers.
The bug was introduced by this patch on August 24, 2019:
patch 8.1.1922: in diff mode global operations can be very slow
Problem: In diff mode global operations can be very slow.
Solution: Do not call diff_redraw() many times, call it once when
redrawing. And also don't update folds multiple times.
Unfortunately, folds were then not updated often enough.
The problem was fixed by adding a short loop to the ex_diffgetput()
function in diff.c to update all the folds in the current tab when the
last difference is removed.
A test for this was added to test_diffmode.vim. Two of the reference
screen dumps for another test in that file,
Test_diffget_diffput_linematch(), had to be changed to have all the
folds closed rather than to have the last diff block remain open.
closes: vim/vim#17457
https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/3fa0d3514b928e0b21ef24594785f9104a3ffafd
Co-authored-by: Gary Johnson <garyjohn@spocom.com>
|
| |
|
| |
ref: https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/33910#issuecomment-2863276239
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem: Computing fold levels for an empty buffer (somehow) breaks the
parser state, resulting in a broken highlighter and foldexpr.
Cached foldexpr parser is invalid after filetype has changed.
Solution: Avoid computing fold levels for empty buffer.
Clear cached foldinfos upon `FileType`.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
**Problem:** The treesitter `foldexpr` calls `get_parser()` for each
line in the buffer when calculating folds. This can be incredibly slow
for buffers where a parser cannot be found (because the result is not
cached), and exponentially more so when the user has many
`runtimepath`s.
**Solution:** Only fetch the parser when it is needed; that is, only
when initializing fold data for a buffer.
Co-authored-by: Jongwook Choi <wookayin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Justin M. Keyes <justinkz@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before calling "attach" a screen object is just a dummy container for
(row, col) values whose purpose is to be sent as part of the "attach"
function call anyway.
Just create the screen in an attached state directly. Keep the complete
(row, col, options) config together. It is still completely valid to
later detach and re-attach as needed, including to another session.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem:
Tests have lots of exec_lua calls which input blocks of code
provided as unformatted strings.
Solution:
Teach exec_lua how to handle functions.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem: Neovim bundles treesitter parsers for bash and python but does
not use them by default. This dilutes the messaging about the bundled
parsers being required for functionality or reasonable out-of-the-box
experience. It also increases the risk of query incompatibilities for no
gain.
Solution: Stop bundling bash and python parser and queries.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem:
`o`-ing on a folded line opens the fold, because the new line gets the
fold level from the above line (level '='), which extends the fold to
the new line. `O` has a similar problem when run on the line below a
fold.
Solution:
Use -1 for the added line to get the lower level from the above/below
line.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Specifically, functions that are run in the context of the test runner
are put in module `test/testutil.lua` while the functions that are run
in the context of the test session are put in
`test/functional/testnvim.lua`.
Closes https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/27004.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Work on https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/27004.
|
| |
|
| |
This reverts commit 9ce1623 in favor of #20750.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem: Sharing queries with upstream and Helix is difficult due to
different capture names.
Solution: Define and document a new set of standard captures that
matches tree-sitter "standard captures" (where defined) and is closer to
Helix' Atom-style nested groups.
This is a breaking change for colorschemes that defined highlights based
on the old captures. On the other hand, the default colorscheme now
defines links for all standard captures (not just those used in bundled
queries), improving the out-of-the-box experience.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| | |
fix(treesitter): improve vim.treesitter.foldexpr
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the command invoked repeatedly to make the changes:
:%s/^\(.*\)|\%(\*\(\d\+\)\)\?$\n\1|\%(\*\(\d\+\)\)\?$/\=submatch(1)..'|*'..(max([str2nr(submatch(2)),1])+max([str2nr(submatch(3)),1]))/g
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Problem: Visual highlight is inconsistent on a folded line with
treesitter foldtext.
Solution: Don't added Folded highlight as it is already in background.
|
| | |
|
|
|
Problem: When using treesitter foldexpr,
* :diffput/get open diff folds, and
* folds are not updated in other windows that contain the updated
buffer.
Solution: Update folds in all windows that contain the updated buffer
and use expr foldmethod.
|
