From b441dafdf53e367c7d43177274bd781c5c73e6e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zeertzjq <zeertzjq@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 16:46:38 +0800
Subject: vim-patch:8.2.2344: using inclusive index for slice is not always
 desired

Problem:    Using inclusive index for slice is not always desired.
Solution:   Add the slice() method, which has an exclusive index. (closes
            vim/vim#7408)

https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/6601b62943a19d4f8818c3638440663d67a17b6a

Cherry-pick a line in docs added later.

Co-authored-by: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
---
 src/nvim/eval.lua | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

(limited to 'src/nvim/eval.lua')

diff --git a/src/nvim/eval.lua b/src/nvim/eval.lua
index 09705148d0..aec5191249 100644
--- a/src/nvim/eval.lua
+++ b/src/nvim/eval.lua
@@ -371,6 +371,7 @@ return {
     simplify={args=1, base=1},
     sin={args=1, base=1, float_func="sin"},
     sinh={args=1, base=1, float_func="sinh"},
+    slice={args={2, 3}, base=1},
     sockconnect={args={2,3}},
     sort={args={1, 3}, base=1},
     soundfold={args=1, base=1},
-- 
cgit