From d22c15107ba3bd019cfbc3e83cd1b12acf258029 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: nicm Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:59:18 +0000 Subject: Don't use a bufferevent for the tty, so we can keep better track of what is being written and when. Also a manpage typo fix from jmc@. --- tty-keys.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'tty-keys.c') diff --git a/tty-keys.c b/tty-keys.c index f23411ae..ecd4bb20 100644 --- a/tty-keys.c +++ b/tty-keys.c @@ -532,8 +532,8 @@ tty_keys_next(struct tty *tty) key_code key; /* Get key buffer. */ - buf = EVBUFFER_DATA(tty->event->input); - len = EVBUFFER_LENGTH(tty->event->input); + buf = EVBUFFER_DATA(tty->in); + len = EVBUFFER_LENGTH(tty->in); if (len == 0) return (0); @@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ complete_key: key = (key & KEYC_MASK_MOD) | KEYC_BSPACE; /* Remove data from buffer. */ - evbuffer_drain(tty->event->input, size); + evbuffer_drain(tty->in, size); /* Remove key timer. */ if (event_initialized(&tty->key_timer)) @@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ discard_key: log_debug("discard key %.*s %#llx", (int)size, buf, key); /* Remove data from buffer. */ - evbuffer_drain(tty->event->input, size); + evbuffer_drain(tty->in, size); return (1); } -- cgit