diff options
author | zeertzjq <zeertzjq@outlook.com> | 2025-02-21 07:02:49 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2025-02-21 07:02:49 +0800 |
commit | 99a6cbe5409dc296d6a5597733d92f63d8bca27e (patch) | |
tree | 2a1e48e513631d527057b0700e5650172748745a /test/old | |
parent | e16bec41b6505678d640755cebe8ec320dec2d45 (diff) | |
download | rneovim-99a6cbe5409dc296d6a5597733d92f63d8bca27e.tar.gz rneovim-99a6cbe5409dc296d6a5597733d92f63d8bca27e.tar.bz2 rneovim-99a6cbe5409dc296d6a5597733d92f63d8bca27e.zip |
vim-patch:9.1.1124: No test for 'listchars' "precedes" with double-width char (#32541)
Problem: No test for 'listchars' "precedes" with double-width char.
Solution: Add a test and fix a typo in code (zeertzjq).
closes: vim/vim#16675
https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/08a83a033a32c0f5bc42eaa63162c21c369cb4ae
Cherry-pick test_listchars.vim changes from patch 9.0.0625.
Fix a regression from #30014 by moving the mb_schar assignment after the
double-width check.
Diffstat (limited to 'test/old')
-rw-r--r-- | test/old/testdir/test_listchars.vim | 32 |
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/test/old/testdir/test_listchars.vim b/test/old/testdir/test_listchars.vim index b82b70746b..8037abfd91 100644 --- a/test/old/testdir/test_listchars.vim +++ b/test/old/testdir/test_listchars.vim @@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ func Test_listchars_foldcolumn() vsplit windo set signcolumn=yes foldcolumn=1 winminwidth=0 nowrap list listchars=extends:>,precedes:< END - call writefile(lines, 'XTest_listchars') + call writefile(lines, 'XTest_listchars', 'D') let buf = RunVimInTerminal('-S XTest_listchars', {'rows': 10, 'cols': 60}) @@ -670,8 +670,36 @@ func Test_listchars_foldcolumn() " clean up call StopVimInTerminal(buf) - call delete('XTest_listchars') endfunc +func Test_listchars_precedes_with_wide_char() + new + setlocal nowrap list listchars=eol:$,precedes:! + call setline(1, '123口456') + call assert_equal(['123口456$ '], ScreenLines(1, 10)) + let attr = screenattr(1, 9) + normal! zl + call assert_equal(['!3口456$ '], ScreenLines(1, 10)) + call assert_equal(attr, screenattr(1, 1)) + normal! zl + call assert_equal(['!口456$ '], ScreenLines(1, 10)) + call assert_equal(attr, screenattr(1, 1)) + normal! zl + call assert_equal(['!<456$ '], ScreenLines(1, 10)) + call assert_equal(attr, screenattr(1, 1)) + call assert_equal(attr, screenattr(1, 2)) + normal! zl + " TODO: should it be '!' instead of '<' here? + call assert_equal(['<456$ '], ScreenLines(1, 10)) + call assert_equal(attr, screenattr(1, 1)) + normal! zl + call assert_equal(['!56$ '], ScreenLines(1, 10)) + call assert_equal(attr, screenattr(1, 1)) + normal! zl + call assert_equal(['!6$ '], ScreenLines(1, 10)) + call assert_equal(attr, screenattr(1, 1)) + + bw! +endfunc " vim: shiftwidth=2 sts=2 expandtab |