diff options
| author | zeertzjq <zeertzjq@outlook.com> | 2023-11-17 07:14:07 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | zeertzjq <zeertzjq@outlook.com> | 2023-11-17 07:16:04 +0800 |
| commit | 809b05bf276892101895a713e1b8d1c209e5dfb7 (patch) | |
| tree | 1bed22e6ccd92f27409b2472a10855c51851ba89 /test | |
| parent | 016c6fae2740781a4c62f382673de1f86732533a (diff) | |
| download | rneovim-809b05bf276892101895a713e1b8d1c209e5dfb7.tar.gz rneovim-809b05bf276892101895a713e1b8d1c209e5dfb7.tar.bz2 rneovim-809b05bf276892101895a713e1b8d1c209e5dfb7.zip | |
vim-patch:9.0.2110: [security]: overflow in ex address parsing
Problem: [security]: overflow in ex address parsing
Solution: Verify that lnum is positive, before substracting from
LONG_MAX
[security]: overflow in ex address parsing
When parsing relative ex addresses one may unintentionally cause an
overflow (because LONG_MAX - lnum will overflow for negative addresses).
So verify that lnum is actually positive before doing the overflow
check.
https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/060623e4a3bc72b011e7cd92bedb3bfb64e06200
Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'test')
| -rw-r--r-- | test/old/testdir/test_excmd.vim | 4 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/old/testdir/test_excmd.vim b/test/old/testdir/test_excmd.vim index 15c83709ad..c729ff4929 100644 --- a/test/old/testdir/test_excmd.vim +++ b/test/old/testdir/test_excmd.vim @@ -745,5 +745,9 @@ func Test_write_after_rename() bwipe! endfunc +" catch address lines overflow +func Test_ex_address_range_overflow() + call assert_fails(':--+foobar', 'E492:') +endfunc " vim: shiftwidth=2 sts=2 expandtab |