aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/functional/lua/mpack_spec.lua
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* test: support upvalues in exec_luaLewis Russell2024-09-21
|
* test: improve test conventionsdundargoc2024-04-23
| | | | | | | | | Specifically, functions that are run in the context of the test runner are put in module `test/testutil.lua` while the functions that are run in the context of the test session are put in `test/functional/testnvim.lua`. Closes https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/27004.
* refactor(lua): rename tbl_islist => islistJustin M. Keyes2024-04-21
| | | | ref #24572
* refactor(test): inject after_each differentlyLewis Russell2024-04-10
|
* test: improve test conventionsdundargoc2024-04-08
| | | | Work on https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/27004.
* refactor: format test/*Justin M. Keyes2024-01-03
|
* fix(vim.mpack): rename pack/unpack => encode/decode #16175Justin M. Keyes2021-10-30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Problem: 1. "unpack" has an unrelated meaning in Lua: https://www.lua.org/manual/5.1/manual.html#pdf-unpack 2. We already have msgpackparse()/msgpackdump() and json_encode()/json_decode(), so introducing another name for the same thing is entropy. Solution: - Rename vim.mpack.pack/unpack => vim.mpack.encode/decode Caveat: This is incongruent with the `Unpacker` and `Packer` functions. - It's probably too invasive to rename those. - They also aren't part of our documented interface. - This commit is "reversible" in the sense that we can always revert it and add `vim.mpack.encode/decode` as _aliases_ to `vim.mpack.pack/unpack`, at any time in the future, if we want stricter fidelity with upstream libmpack. Meanwhile, `vim.mpack.encode/decode` is currently the total _documented_ interface of `vim.mpack`, so this change serves the purpose of consistent naming in the Nvim stdlib.
* feat(lua): make vim.mpack support vim.NIL and vim.empty_dict()Björn Linse2021-09-09