aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTiago Cunha <tcunha@gmx.com>2009-02-02 15:53:33 +0000
committerTiago Cunha <tcunha@gmx.com>2009-02-02 15:53:33 +0000
commitb5f4b7730beeb02e58a563986693cf2aa87e2ea3 (patch)
tree1b9f7b5ff546a7c93567c2329364487050f65a01
parent5a7b7aaa1ca122fb492dbf0212627aed4ca3c074 (diff)
downloadrtmux-b5f4b7730beeb02e58a563986693cf2aa87e2ea3.tar.gz
rtmux-b5f4b7730beeb02e58a563986693cf2aa87e2ea3.tar.bz2
rtmux-b5f4b7730beeb02e58a563986693cf2aa87e2ea3.zip
Update.
-rw-r--r--FAQ3
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ
index 8bdc0ed3..ae5470a2 100644
--- a/FAQ
+++ b/FAQ
@@ -14,13 +14,14 @@ tmux offers several advantages over screen:
- multiple paste buffers;
- choice of vim or emacs key layouts;
- an option to limit the window size;
+- a more usable status line syntax, with the ability to display the first line
+ of output of a specific command;
- a cleaner, modern, easily extended, BSD-licensed codebase.
There are still a few features screen includes that tmux omits:
- builtin serial and telnet support; this is bloat and is unlikely to be added
to tmux;
-- a more customisable status line, albeit with an awful syntax;
- wider platform support, for example IRIX and AIX, and for odd terminals.
- better UTF-8 support.