diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | TODO | 34 |
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 5 deletions
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ TODO soonish maybe: (or pane or session), perhaps something like #{W:#{window_name} }. It would need to be able to reach into a window's options in order to allow different windows - to have different format, maybe an operator to evaluate an + to have different format. (DONE) An operator to evaluate an option value as a format, maybe make it so E: on evaluates the result as a format again something like, so end up with something like #{W:#{E:window-status-format} } @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ TODO soonish maybe: 6) status-left-length and similar will need to be taken into account, perhaps add an alternative form of the length limit - eg #{l:#{status-left-length},#{...}}. + eg #{L:#{status-left-length},#{...}}. 7) Supporting trimming the window list and adding <> might be tricky, probably a second pass over the format_range list to @@ -193,18 +193,42 @@ TODO soonish maybe: to trim first, so some way to mark that is needed (maybe a priority or something in the alignment/length limit). - 8) Formats are going to get very long so perhaps standardize +(DONE) 8) Formats are going to get very long so perhaps standardize them a bit so they are all something like #{F/argument:text} then then could be #{A/foo;B/bar:text} rather than #{A:foo,#{B:bar,text}} and so on. Need to keep the old style for compatibility, at least for the most popular formats. So the status-left part would be something like: - #{A/left;S/#{status-left-style};M/left;l/#{status-left-length};E:status-left} + #{A/left;S/#{status-left-style};M/left;L/#{status-left-length};E:status-left} - Where A = alignment, S = style, M = mouse, l = length limit, + Where A = alignment, S = style, M = mouse, L = length limit, E = expand again. + Existing formats are: + + #{l:foo} <-- literal + #{m:foo} <-- match + #{C:foo} <-- search + #{b:foo} <-- basename + #{d:foo} <-- dirname + #{t:foo} <-- time + #{q:foo} <-- quote + #{s/a/b/:foo} <-- sub + #{=123:foo} <-- length + + #{||:foo,bar} <-- or + #{&&:foo,bar} <-- and + #{!=:foo,bar} <-- neq + #{==:foo,bar} <-- eq + #{?foo,bar,baz} <-- if + + So comparisons and ? can stay as they are. + + All other formats can be parsed as #{X/arg1/arg2/arg3:...} + with an optional leading and trailing /. Each argument can + be expanded. + 9) Then status-format can be an array option specifying multiple status lines. Perhaps one option for top and one for bottom. |